Monthly Archives: November 2007

Interesting TED talk about the use of bioenergy.

This is a really well-done presentation, but I don’t think I get the point. I’ve watched this video several times and am a bit confused. It talks about how coal and oil are really broken down forms of biological energy and that we need to use biology to…do something with it. But…so what?

Maybe it’s the Generation X gene in me, but I just don’t see the point. I knew all of this before. Where’s the innovation or insight that is evident in most TED presenters? I mean…sure we should use coal for energy. But it pollutes. So now what? How do the mountain of seeds – something that sounded really great – impact the mountain of coal…that he also says is dangerous to mine. What’s the problem with ethanol – sure it’s crappy, but it’s cheap, we can make it, and it works.

Tesla Motors has hired Ze’ev Driori as its new CEO. Michael Marks, former CEO of Flextronics (and Tesla investor) has been the interim CEO.

From the Press Release:


The first company he founded was Monolithic Memories, a Silicon Valley semiconductor firm that pioneered fundamental advances in memory and logic technology, before being acquired by AMD in 1987. Under his leadership, Monolithic introduced programmable read-only memory (PROM) and programmable array logic (PAL), which revolutionized many aspects of computer and electronic systems technology. As CEO through 1981, Ze’ev was responsible for R&D, manufacturing, marketing, finance, world wide sales and overseas operations for product assembly. Ze’ev served as chairman of the board from 1981 through 1987.

While Ze’ev clearly has the track record to take on Tesla’s challenge (and it certainly is a big challenge), I had anticipated a longer tenure for Michael Marks. I thought Marks had some great experiences that the company could build on to bring them to commercialization.

Ze’ev, however, sounds like a great person for the job. They have searched for this position for quite some time and it looks like they’ve found a winner.

VeraSun agreed to purchase US Bioenergy for around $685 Million.

Read the Press Release.

Under the agreement, 0.81 shares of VeraSun stock will be issued for each outstanding share of U.S. BioEnergy, valuing the deal at $686.2 million based on Wednesday’s closing prices and U.S. BioEnergy’s 79.6 million shares as of Oct. 31.

More on this a little later.

Update:
This acquisition makes perfect sense. VeraSun is desperately trying to keep a top position in the ethanol market and this acquisition keeps them their. Their scaling back of one greenfield facility was a sign that expansion through new capacity wasn’t really viable at current demand/prices. So this is the next best thing – grabbing market share through M&A.

The market likes the deal too. These two companies have apparently fared well during high corn/low ethanol pricing. So it would seem to be a good match. This could launch them ahead of POET and ADM in terms of capacity. But if things get more tumultuous for corn and ethanol than this could be a big disadvantage to them. There’s only so much you can gain by scale with regard to this industry. Corn processing is a local game. So the real way to keep ahead of price fluctuations are through risk mitigation of supplier and customer contracts. Everybody has to get good at that function in order to survive. This acquisition, then, won’t automatically put them at a better position either operationally or financially. So the game is still afoot.

Presentation given by GM’s Bob Lutz at the LA Auto show.

The video discusses some updates on the Volt. Nothing really new, but it’s a nice update.

While the housing crisis has taken center stage in the nation’s economic dialog (as it should), the ethanol discussion has died down a bit. While all the negative press wasn’t that great for producers, the broader economic environment will have a tremendous effect on the prospects of this industry. So it begs the question, where is the U.S. biofuels industry headed?

Where are we now?
Well, without going too deep into it, let’s look at a few bullets:
- new plant construction projects are being cancelled.
- construction costs have increased due to a lack of available resources to build
- high corn prices have impacted the industry’s profitability
- low ethanol prices due to increased production (and questionably lower/flat demand) have squeezed producers
- transportation options have higher costs

The news over the last few months, I think, paints a pretty clear picture of the challenges the industry is facing. I think we can, then, assert what the future outlook of this industry might be.

There are three elements that I think will shape the short-term outlook on the biofuels market:

Cost Management
Lets face it, the biofuels industry is a crappy one. When you’re buying and selling a commodity with fluctuating prices, you’re sure to get squeezed. So the viability of large producers comes in their ability to manage the risk involved with pricing through hedging practices.

Further, this current crop of production plants have to improve their efficiencies from all angles. This impacts product yield, energy consumption (and co-generation), and overhead costs.

Demand
It’s not clear that the actual demand for ethanol will continue to grow. Even though the government is pushing for it, the market still needs to adopt it. The sharp reduction in ethanol prices in recent months seems to indicate an imbalance of supply and demand. In particular, it could mean that demand is increasing more slowly than capacity is increasing (so it would support recent plant construction pull-backs). It could also mean that demand is waning. It’s not quite clear which. But the impact, then, is that while each company is jockeying for market supremacy, they must also manage their expansion plans to coincide with the real market demand.

Technology Development
It’s already evident that the ethanol industry will not continue without a breakthrough in cellulosic ethanol. It’s gotta happen or we’re done.

What isn’t well discussed is an innovation on ethanol refining technology. No matter what the upstream process technology is, ethanol must be separated from water. Currently, distillation is the method of choice. But it’s energy intensive. Huge strides could be made with a low-cost means of separating ethanol from water.

So where are we headed?

Problems with financing
The problems affecting the commercial banks will affect this industry. Equity money is fairly available, although not necessarily easily gotten given the prospects of this market. But these types of projects usually don’t go forward without some level of debt financing. And the debt markets are in the dumps at the moment. So everything I say for the rest of this post should be prefaced by saying “..if they can get financing…”.

A day of reconning
It’s clear that there will be a period of consolidation. While we have already seen some acquisitions, most likely, the smaller, less efficient facilities (say, less than 60 Million gal/yr) will go out of business. This business can only be survived on scale and these facilities won’t be able to manage. According to the RFA’s list of biorefineries, this assertion would implicate around 70 different facilities with around 2 Billion+ gallons/yr of capacity. Pacific Ethanol’s story, then, doesn’t look very compelling. And POET’s looks a little dangerous (they have lots of smaller facilities).

New Players
The big boys in the ethanol (and even the biodiesel industry, although we’re not quite there yet) will end up being ok if it keeps playing smart: VeraSun, POET, ADM, and Biofuel Energy. But the weakness of many of its other competitors could be a great opportunity for a new, technology-focused startup to emerge. Verenium would be an interesting opportunity. If their work with developing an enzyme solution for a cellulosic format, then they could do well. If Range Fuels’ first plant does well, it could be poised to scale rather quickly.

New Fuels
For all the hype, ethanol is just a fuel additive at this point (and biodiesel is just a lark, albeit one with a lot of potential). But ethanol’s life could end right here. It certainly has detractions as a fuel and with its compatibility with current transportation methods. But other chemicals could emerge as fuels in coming years. Biobutanol is getting good uptake and has some interesting prospects. Dimethylfuran has some potential as well. Synthetic fuels (gasoline produced from non-oil feedstocks like coal or plants) also have some interesting elements as well.

End of Round 1
In short, I’d predict that we’re looking at the calm before the storm. While I wouldn’t use the word “bubble”, we are certainly looking at a potential shake-out of weak competitors (it’s healthy though – we shouldn’t look at it the same way we look at the first internet bubble bursting).

What we should really be preparing for – and perhaps investing in if given the opportunity – is Biofuels Gen 2.0. Gen 1.0 – corn ethanol, and soy bean biodiesel – may be reaching its feasibility limits. While it might not be completely down hill from here, it could be quite rough until some new opportunities come online. Get your checkbooks ready though.

I’ll bring up some topics for Biofuels Gen 2.0 (or Fuels 3.0).

Ethanol Producer Magazine is reporting that a private investment company owned by Bill Gates has made its shares of ethanol producer Pacific Ethanol up for sale:

Cascade Investment LLC, a private investment company owned by Microsoft chairman Bill Gates, has registered its 10.5 million shares of Pacific Ethanol Inc. as being offered for public sale. The registration came in a Nov. 16 SEC filing that noted Cascade Investment’s 20.55 percent stake in Pacific Ethanol “may be offered for sale from time to time during the period the registration statement” remains effective.

Although this seems very crazy, it’s prudent for this company to stop losing its money. The real news, then, is weather the ethanol industry is going to a “sell” status instead of just a “hold”. It’s certainly not a “buy” anymore. Although some start-up companies might be worth looking at.

Or another, just as relevant question is weather or not Pacific Ethanol is worth the investment. They have made big promises over the last few years, but at the end of the day, they’re a small player. They don’t have a roadmap to get them to be a top 5 player. They’re not even a top 10 player anymore (see chart below).

So it’s no surprise that Pacific Ethanol might lose one of their primary investors. I mean, if you lose their shirt, they’re going to back out from the deal. That’s no surprise.

  Company Capacity (gal/yr) Planned Capacity (gal/yr) Market Share

I recently wrote about VeraSun’s cancellation of its Reynolds, Indiana facility. There reason was falling ethanol prices. But this didn’t quite make sense to me. Low prices due to expanded supply indicate a lowering of demand. I’ve been having a hard time wrapping my head around this dynamic. There is a good article on ethanol imports in Ethanol Producer magazine that gives me some help on this:

High-profile ethanol companies, however, are scaling back their efforts and new plant construction is falling, when compared with 2006. Plant operating margins are squeezed and the supply is exceeding the demand. If there is such an over-abundant domestic supply of ethanol, why are oil companies still looking to purchase the oxygenate from foreign sources?

This is an interesting article in that it illustrates that U.S. companies are still importing low-price ethanol in spite of high tariffs. Apparently, the declining ethanol pricing is slowing the importation and making U.S. ethanol look more attractive. This is a bit strange – lower prices are both helping and hurting U.S. producers. There’s three ramifications here that we should take a look at.

Lower Demand Outlook could burst a PE bubble
A lower product demand is a bad omen for this industry. The industry is playing a game of music chairs right now – and the music just stopped. Growing capacity only works when your market prospects are growing. The lowered price coinciding with increasing supply, then, is a strong indicator that the wheels are coming off the ethanol industry. Currently, the U.S. only has enough for around a 5% blend with gasoline (E5). But the industry has projects to double capacity. That’s billions of dollars that has been put down that has to be taken off the table (or just lost).

This is a grave situation for the private equity money that has been put into the industry in recent months. These investments are dependent on continued growth through the next decade. If this stall is short term, than it could just slow down the current momentum the industry is enjoying. If the stall is long term, it could really kill development opportunities.

Narrowing production margins indicates new process technology needed
Look, the biofuels industry is a relatively crappy industry. You have relatively high feedstock prices for relatively low end product pricing. You’re getting squeezed. So having a low ethanol price – something that a lot of politicians are advocating – is really bad for producers.

What this means is that producers have to step up development of reducing production costs. POET recently announced (rather uninterestingly) that it plans on using waste biomass to produce energy for its plant (using a solid waste fuel boiler). There are increasing need for focus on the distillation process – a significant use of energy within the overall production process. So there is evidence that companies are redoubling their efforts to make their production facilities more efficient. Ultimately, it’s one of the few ways they improve their profitability outlook given the pricing risk inherent to the industry.

Cellulosic is mandatory
The biggest impact to this industry is that its future prospects are highly dependent on the commercialization of cellulosic-based feedstocks. Having a cheap, managed, feedstock that can be produced at affordable prices would be a great advantage for this industry. Currently, volume requirements are are limited with corn and, given these changing dynamics, nwe investment dollars would be poorly spent.

RedHerring has a nice piece on a meeting of Midwestern state governors (and the Premier of Manitoba, Canada).

An out-take:


The Midwestern alliance is the first major group to set specific targets for E85, the fuel made from a blend of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline. By 2025, they want 33 percent of gas stations, or around 9,700 locations, in the region to offer E85. They also want at least 50 percent of all transportation energy consumed in the region to be supplied by locally produced biofuels, such as ethanol fuel or biodiesel, by 2025.

This is an interesting article, not because of its relevance to the biofuels development to the region.

And just for the sake of rigor, let’s see what impact these suggestions would have:
- 27% of greenhouse gas emissions are from this region which we’ll assume correlates to 27% of U.S. gasoline consumption: 140 Bil gallons X 27% = 37.8 Billion Gallons of annual demand.
- E85, then, would require ethanol production of 85% * 37.8 Bil Gal/yr = 32.13 Billion Gallons of ethanol/yr.
- We currently produce around 7 Billion gallons in 200 plants. We would need the equivalent of 4.59X the number of plants we have now (around 900+ equivalent plants, which includes expansion of current facilities).

That’s a lot of ethanol. It’s debatable that the U.S. could produce that much ethanol as it is (meaning, cellulosic would be mandatory just to serve the Midwestern states, let alone the coasts).

The Midwestern states are in bad shape. Michigan and Ohio are particularly in a bad way. I’ve been in Detroit the last month visiting family for the holidays and the environment is more depressed than I’ve ever seen. There are “For Sale” signs everywhere. Hardly anyone at the local malls doing holiday shopping. And Quicken Loans moving into downtown Detroit lead the evening news and the national new (such a small event got so much attention). The city counts new job creation just as closely as gas price changes. And it’s not getting better.

This big push for expanded biofuels production is really a bet by local government’s on developing the region’s economies. The front line of all of the country’s bad news is in this Midwestern states (real estate, health care, job losses). While there are many who object to the subsidies (corn and blending), and the energy inefficiencies of ethanol, all that doesn’t matter to people with no jobs. Last I checked, Michigan’s unemployment rate was north of 7%. That’s Baghdad crazy. An emerging biofuels industry would be a great boon for the area.

It would also be well deserved. Much of the Big 10 and other local area schools are really pushing some great research into new advanced materials, catalysts, bio-feedstock technology development. Northwestern, Michigan, Michigan State, Iowa, and Wisconsin are all doing breakthrough research. Even schools like Purdue, Ohio State and Penn State have made some very significant break-throughs.

But this desire may be misplaced. The detriments to ethanol as a biofuel (not just its current impact as a fuel additive) are real. The economics aren’t really that good right now due to a variety of factors. So while it would be great to make the midwest a haven for biofuels production, betting on biodiesel or E85 might be misplaced. Most notably, there may not be enough ethanol production capacity to meet the desired goals. But more so, the fuel industry is truly a global one. Making a bet on one local market that, unlike petroleum, doesn’t utilize the same infrastructure is a tough one for the industry to undertake. And that may be the real end to these governors’ stories.

Superstrong nanotubes
There has been a lot of interest in developing superstrong, long chains of carbon nanotubes. It’s one case where the need has exceeded the innovation. Researchers at the University of Cambridge (the one in England) and Natick Soldier Research Development Center (the one in Massachusetts) have made the first discovery of superstrong nanotubes. From the Technology Review article:

These nanotube fibers matched the highest reported strengths for a couple of the strongest commercially available fibers, Zylon and Dyneema, also used in bullet-proof vests. A lone, extremely strong nanotube fiber was off the charts, reaching nine gigapascals of stress–far beyond any other reported material–before breaking. Earlier work with carbon nanotubes has produced fibers that withstand at most three gigapascals.

This is a very important discovery as it is the first step in making some new types of materials available. Most notably carbon fiber bodies for cars, the cable for the space elevator, and bullet-proof sweaters. The latter will sell well in Detroit.

Salt Water Hydrogen
I thought this was a crock when I read about it, but apparently it’s getting some attention. Essentially, this scientist at the fully-accredited Pennsylvania State University duplicated the research of some guy from Eria, PA who got a test tube of salt water to ignite by applying radio waves. The theory is that the radio waves somehow strip the hydrogen out of the water molecules. It’s the hydrogen that was ignited. This has some interesting implications as a means of generating hydrogen if it can be scaled. The real question to be answered is what the mechanics of this system are and what the yield can be.

Carbon nano…you know what, I don’t even understand this one but here it is
From GreenCarCongress:

Researchers at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Colorado are reporting the first successful electrical connection between hydrogenase enzymes and carbon nanotubes.

In the new study, Michael J. Heben, Paul W. King, and colleagues selected the [FeFe] hydrogenase I (CaHydI) from the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum. Neither CaHydI nor the SWNTs were specially modified to facilitate formation of complexes. The hydrogenase remains catalytically active so long as anaerobic conditions are maintained.

While I understand the pieces of this research (i.e. fermentation of C. acetobutylicum and SWNT formation), I don’t understand what this system’s usefulness is. Apparently it has something to do with fuel cell operation. If I had to guess, it sounds as though these researchers found a way to get nanotubes to self-assemble using this hydrogenase complex (with the products of the fermentation as the source of carbon?). This could be very important as there has been no reliable, controllable means of producing nanotubes in any length or reliability. I’m just not figuring out where the fuel-cell aspect comes in.

Ethanol producers are mulling over building a coast-to-coast pipeline.

See the AP Article.

Paul and Mears estimate a dedicated pipeline would cost about $1 million per mile to build — about $2 billion from the Midwest to the East Coast, where strong markets already exist.

Most existing pipelines move petroleum products from south to north, Mears said. “They don’t flow in the right direction — ethanol wants to go the other way,” he said.

Moving ethanol through a pipeline would cost 3 cents to 6 cents a gallon, which is at least competitive with existing shipping methods, Mears said.

An ethanol-exclusive pipeline could move more than 4 million gallons of the fuel daily, or the entire production of about 30 average-size ethanol plants, Mears said. That volume, along with government incentives and long-term shipping commitments, would be necessary to support a dedicated pipeline, he said.

There is also another issue. Essentially there is a last-mile problem on both sides of an agricultural pipeline. Whereas oil drilling is localized, farming is not. Moving corn is like moving cement – it’s so low value /wt that moving it over a certain distance becomes unprofitable. So it means that the supply side of the biofuels industry has to be made economical with very little capital expense related to transportation.

The airline industry is a good comparison for this. On one hand, we have relatively few large airports serving major markets. At the same time, we have lots of small markets that also serve these larger markets (via regional airlines). This discussion is similar – we’re essentially talking about developing a regional airlines model for ethanol distribution.

But here’s the kicker. Putting in pipelines isn’t that much cheaper for smaller, more dispersed areas (or using our airline comparison, a small regional plane doesn’t cost that much less than a 737). This is because putting in a small pipe still takes much of the same planning and labor for putting in a big pipe (the cost of the pipe is relatively small). And therein lies a big barrier. It can be done… but man, those numbers better get better or we’re done.

I’d applaud anyone with the courage to back such a project. It would really mean that we’re doing this for real.